A Look at the Portuguese World

 

h facebook h twitter h pinterest

The guardian of the word

Written by 

Urbelino Ferreira is a current member of the board of the association of writers of Madeira and one of the most prominent figures of the cultural activity in the island. In this talk, we spoke about this organization, writers and also books.

Why there was a need to create an association of writers in Madeira (AEM)?
Urbelino Ferreira: Well, then, some two decades ago, (cannot remember the exact date of the foundation of the association) everyone felt the need to create an organization from a cultural standpoint, with writers of different areas, whether in journalism, literature and college professors who wrote texts as a collaboration in the newspapers. In the post-April 25 there was this urge to be organized. They created the association of writers from Madeira to be gathered and create plans for cultural development.

Also weighed the fact that were islanders and are far from large urban centers, said more cultural?
UF: On the issue of isolation I do not think it had a weight; it had more to do as an organized movement. Although there was a distance that still exists at the time there was a spirit, with the revolution of April, a kind of creative wave that pushed for the creation of clubs, organizations and associations of different areas, because during the dictatorship there was the fear of form such organizations. At the time, participants of culture in all areas were writing papers and books, without saying much of everything, because there was censorship.

What has changed in the twenty years of existence of the association of writers Madeira? For better and worse?
UF: What has improved because I have a deep organizational spirit, half a dozen years after the death of former President, We had elections that had never existed before, we created a headquarters, it was that fundamentally has changed. Which doesn't mean that the before and after, post-death Jose Antonio Goncalves, improvements were not there. There were changes in the organizational design of the association, but not in cultural participation. Jose Antonio Goncalves regardless of not having or not that organization spirit, had almost no need for it, was a liberal, a mentor of the culture. He always was creating, participating, developing projects and organizing cultural events throughout the year. For all these reasons he did not need all this organizational design, which was much more productive before the election of the AEM, because Jose Antonio Goncalves was a cultural actor, made culture the whole day, was permanent. Even individually he was culture, talking about it and even offering the books he published. It was a constant in his life. In the post-mortem, after the elections, some problems and frictions within the chosen direction generated a lack of continuity. There was all this start with the organizational headquarters and a set of interests, there was even the idea of ​​creating a body of analysis of new authors who were appearing, which was never done. There were organizational visibility, but the performance plan was not feasible. In this second term to which I belong, the situation deteriorated completely, because we have not convened a single meeting of the executive direction. There is no approved plans, or accounts, there is not even cultural visibility, with the exception of "meeting on Wednesdays," which lasted a few months, was a conversation with political, literary or artistic figures and a handful so to speak and after that nothing has been done to date.

Speaking of writers, you state that there is very little literary quality in Portugal. The last 20 years everything is published, this is the reality?
UF: I must confine myself exclusively to the panorama of Madeira. In the post-April 25, with the freedom of expression, there were many people who love to read, buy books and write texts that were called in the drawer and of course, that with freedom of April, they wanted to express their views. It has been publishing books in different areas, less in the novel, more in the poetry and tales, which from my point of view; they actually have little quality, which is why we want to implement such a group selection of literature. The so-called Liberal editor has published many, many books that do not have much cultural value. This is my opinion.

Personal?
State: Not only personal, but also as a compulsive reader who knows a great diversity of literary styles. I remain a strong supporter of the masters. When we leave the Eças, Torgas and Pessoas, our classic and all do I like some young authors such as Joao de Melo, some African and South American writers, such as Gabriel Garcia Marques, when I see books that are beyond this standard of rigid cultural and intellectual value, then I lose interest. For me a simple story, a poem, whatever it is, necessarily have to have a message to society and I see many publications that do not have anything new. They try to copy the style of other authors, the book is not plagiarism, more in the concept and the form and they think this may make them great writers as these masters. There is much published which is worthless. The responsibility of this is the publisher, not the author who writes and presents it. A publishing company as a business must have a group of people who organize and endorse books, or not assign any value to a culture work. These parameters must be respected. This question of having many worthless books is the sole fault of the "liberal." I have nothing against them, has contributed a lot to support the writers of Madeira, there is a positive side to it. On the other hand, I have to take this credit off because public works without any cultural value, serve only to satisfy the ego of the author.

The islanders, in particular, from the Azores and Madeira, are more likely to write poetry, or not? It has to do with their essence?
UF: I understand that, in the terminology island. For a person who has the gift of writing and literary writing a poem, both can live on an island in terms of geography, territory surrounded by water, or within an island within a continent. We have several islands, even from the point of view of housing. Specifically, answering the questions about the poets, whether of Madera or other islands, I understand that, because the distance due to isolation are some of these factors will fuel this revolt, the message rather than a poet who lives in city ​​with all the perks. In my personal opinion, the poet writes with more fluency and claw when they have more angers, whether cultural, social, political and economic.

The idea of ​​the suffering artist?
UF: That is the idea of ​​"suffering" that is, we do not agree with the situation, with humanity. It is the consternation that leads the poet to be on the counter and the only way to intervene is through writing. His weapon is the poem with all these contradictions. Of course, living in a geographical island, surrounded by sea, whether surrounded by the city or a neighborhood while an island in itself, the poem is the way they participate in civil society and in a cultural point of view, in my opinion, this is what leads them to write. In the particular case of Madeira and other islanders, this revolt is the result of continuous insulation, the vein, the desire to transcribe it to paper, is to communicate rather than a rifle or other weapons.

What are the authors that you recur frequently? Always present?
UF: I've heard that question from many people and not wanting to be different and coherent, I affirm that I have not a book. My support is not a single work may be two or three books by a particular author. Always resort to the masters of romance, philosophy, and poetry. In terms of what I intend to write, I want to convey the message, I'll drink from the authors the classical antiquity, the Greeks, to Plato, if necessary. I'm not exactly read one book, I am sorry for faithfulness, for truth, when I want to convey to the quality principle and a message, I will get Eça de Queirós has so many novels, to remember a certain situation, how he said it and how he criticized the society. I like to reread the works, but I always try to read new books. When I go to the shelf, sometimes, is not just the pleasure of rereading the author, may do it to revive the relevance of that text at that time. Much more, it serves as a benchmark, like a lot of comparative history, the contemporary writing from the point of view of information, politics and how it was written two hundred years ago and if we have this attention, we got the easy observation that a particular author had the same position of the rulers and the people. If we transcribe these grafts to the reality of today, or two years ago, fits perfectly, like a hat.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.

FaLang translation system by Faboba

Podcast

 

 

 

 

Eventos